Each issue of the journal, centred around a specific theme, aims to gather critical perspectives through various forms of original and rigorous research. While adhering to predefined contribution types outlined below, each edition may incorporate unique nuances carefully curated by the respective guest editors. Therefore, please refer to the Call for Papers for specific topics related to each contribution type.
Two Calls for Papers are launched simultaneously; however, there is no overlap in themes and topics, and the editorial processes are independent. As a result, authors are welcome to submit proposals to both Calls.
To submit your work, utilise the submission button in the left column, which will redirect you to the Open Journal System platform (registration required). This platform streamlines navigation for authors, editors, and reviewers throughout the submission workflow. Online tutorials are available for guidance. Before preparing your documents for submission, please download the guidelines using the button located in the left column.
Project Essays are predominantly visual, akin to visual essays, focusing on architectural projects, urban plans, or endeavours within the broader domain of architecture and urbanism. This could include explorations of studies for films or fieldwork projects. Rather than merely serving as illustrations, these essays should primarily consist of a thoughtfully curated collection of drawings, typological diagrams, images, and/or other pertinent visual documents that substantiate the facts and arguments of the project.
Moreover, each essay should incorporate a written component spanning 3000-4000 words, preferably organised into distinct sections. The textual aspect should not serve as subtitles to the visual elements but should instead underscore arguments with essential content not necessarily depicted in the images. This may include theoretical explorations, key references, and other relevant considerations.
Full articles primarily focus on textual content and showcase original and relevant research in the field of architecture and urbanism. These essays should demonstrate a contemporary methodological approach and a comprehensive understanding of international perspectives. They should explore diverse relationships between architectural projects, drawing, architectural theory, architectural history, art history, science, anthropology, geography, philosophy, visual culture studies, and other related disciplines. The essays should have a word count between 6000-8000 words and may include up to ten visual elements such as images, tables, and diagrams.
Clear and critical reviews that offer insightful analysis and fresh perspectives on specific architectural projects, urban plans, buildings, exhibitions, and more. The written component should be between 3000-4000 words, allowing for an in-depth exploration of the subject matter. Additionally, authors have the opportunity to enhance their reviews with up to ten visual elements, including images, tables, and diagrams, to provide further context and support their arguments.
Original interviews play a crucial role in enriching the understanding of the specific theme highlighted in each journal issue. These interviews may be conducted through direct invitations or proposed by authors in response to the Call for Papers. It is essential to emphasise that interviews do not undergo the traditional peer-review process, setting them apart from other submissions. Their inclusion is contingent on their relevance and the valuable insights they provide on the chosen theme. Authors interested in submitting proposals of this nature should contact the Editorial Board at project-research@arq.up.pt before proceeding with their submissions.
The journal is dedicated to translating essential texts by notable authors that are not currently available in English. Authors are encouraged to propose translations, but it is imperative that they contact the Editorial Board at project-research@arq.up.pt before initiating the submission process. The inclusion of translations is contingent upon their relevance and the valuable insights they offer on the selected theme.
All articles, with the exception of those directly invited by the guest editors, interviews and text translations, undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process. This ensures that both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the review procedure. The responsibility for selecting abstracts lies with the guest editors, who are supported by the editorial board. Once accepted and following the submission of project essays, full articles, or review articles, the guest editors assign a minimum of two expert reviewers in the respective field.
The reviewers provide their evaluations anonymously using a provided form, offering recommendations on whether the article should be accepted or rejected. Ultimately, the final decision to accept or reject the article rests with the guest editors, who may also seek input from the editorial board.
Project : Research directs editors to the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Additionally, it advises all reviewers to adhere to the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.